Before and during his presidency, Donald Trump had a very active Twitter page with a large following. On January 8, 2021, Twitter barred Trump's account (@realDonaldTrump) from their platform citing "risk of further incitement of violence." This page focuses on the ban, platform governance, and the ethical considerations associated with
This tweet is historically significant because Trump falsely claimed that the 2020 presidential election was stolen from him. Trump's words not only perpetuated claims of election fraud but also appeared to condone and justify the actions of the rioters, who breached the Capitol in an attempt to overturn the election results.
The tweet's tone of defiance against the democratic process likely played a significant role in Twitter's decision to ban his account. Twitter's decision to ban Trump's account can be seen as a response to the immediate threat of further incitement of violence and the broader pattern of behavior that violated its policies against the glorification of violence and incitement to harm.
By allowing such rhetoric on its platform, Twitter would risk being complicit in the spread of misinformation and the escalation of political tensions, ultimately hurting the integrity of its platform and the safety of its users. Therefore, this tweet prompted Twitter to take action to protect public safety and uphold its community standards, even at the expense of banning a prominent political figure.
2019: Former Cuban President Raul Castro and other accounts run by the Cuban government
2018: Alex Jones for abusive behavior
2017: Martin Shkreli for harassing a female journalist
2020: Steve Bannon banned after suggesting Anthony Fauci and FBI Director Christopher Wray should be beheaded
2021: Former MLB player Aubrey Huff for Covid-19 misinformation
While Trump's rhetoric may have been controversial or offensive, it was still protected speech under the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. Critics of the ban argue that the decision was subjective and lacked transparency, with concerns raised about potential bias and censorship by social media companies. They suggest that the ban may have been motivated more by political considerations or public pressure than by consistent enforcement of platform rule, and believe that instead of silencing him, platforms should engage in more robust counter-speech and fact-checking to challenge and contextualize his statements.
Trump's ban establishes a notable precedent regarding the control of political discourse on social media platforms. It illustrates that influential political figures are subject to the same platform regulations as every other user. The ban highlights the significant influence held by social media companies in shaping public conversation and emphasizes the necessity for clear and equitable moderation protocols.
Learn more about Social Media and the way it influences our generation
Click here
Built by Isabella Towning, Noah Hicks, Maggie Mattox, Rawley Casey, Caroline Yaffa
Powered by Webflow.
